Maxwell's Demon

There is a boring intro, pictures below…OK, here’s a taster…

Consider the history of numbers, it starts, of course, with the whole numbers, starting from one.  The numbers we use to count things, to a mathematician the Natural Numbers.  Subtraction however is a very useful operation but it has a problem seems like a reasonable thing to do, but the answer is not a natural number.  After a surprisingly long time people accepted that it was worth including negative numbers and zero.  This gives a system in which we can add and subtract freely without coming across new numbers, we can say that this new system the Integers is closed under addition and subtraction.

God gave us the integers; the rest is the work of Man.
Leopold Kronecker

The next step is to use multiplication.  The integers are closed under multiplication.  However consider the following equation: .  In this case we can see that the only possible value for is 2, as .  To calculate this we need an additional operation: division, so we have .  Once again we are faced with a problem.  Division needs new numbers, as the only solution of  is .  The solution is simply to include these numbers in our system.  We now have the collection of all fractions.  The Rational numbers.  

Continuing this process we can now consider a sequence of multiplications and additions together and ask for solutions.  For example taking a number, multiplying it by itself, and then asking when this is equal to the original number plus one.  This gives a polynomial: , which is the same as .  By convention polynomials are written with 0 on one side of the equation.  Finding solutions to such equations has a long history in early mathematics, and the general case was only understood in the nineteenth century, involving Complex numbers and the elegant insights of Galois.  

What happens when we allow more than one unknown in the equation? The answer is that instead of getting a small number of points in many cases we get a line.  For example consider the equation .  The points that satisfy this equation are the points on a circle of radius 1.  By changing the we get circles of different radii. When this value is we no longer have a line the only possible point is , that is the circle of radius , as both and must have positive values.  Similarly if this value is positive there are no solutions with real numbers (I will avoid complex numbers for this post).  

A different way of looking at this is to consider the function this attaches a value to every point on the plane.  We then want to consider the set of points with a particular value.  In the first example this is .  

Lets now go to three unknowns.  We now start to get very interesting as the sets of solutions move from lines to surfaces.  As a first example we can try the generalisation of the equation for the circle above to three variables .  Perhaps unsurprisingly we get a sphere:

So what else can we get from these equations.  In fact a very wide collection of things, and I encourage you to play around using some of the software available to draw arbitrary equations.  For the images in this post I used surfex, a front end for surf, but this is a little bit of a meal to set up, also it does not produce three dimensional models.   There are easier options on the web,  the Liverpool surface modelling package can be used to generate models online and it has an online front endend to play with.

So have you been away to play?  That is a far easier way to gain intuition than trying to decypher my cryptic comments.  However a some point one moves from being willing to simply try random equations to wanting to put some control on the process.  So here is some guidance as to how you might do that.  Yes, this is part of the plot to generate unlimited numbers of maths based logos, that I mentioned in the last post.

To design I will work with the idea of genus introduced in the last post.  This is the number of holes through the surface.  The definite cheat of google can home straight in on equations for the Torus/donut with genus one.

We will therefore start by trying genus two.  As two dimensions are easier to work with, what can we do on the plane.  A little playing comes up with that gives a figure of eight.  For consistency I will draw this in three dimensions.  If we do not include in the polynomial then this direction does not change where the zeroes lie so we get a cylinder with cross section given by the curve in two dimensions.  

So how can we use this curve to give a surface?  We have to make it change with , and when we cut through for some value of we will see two curves.  Lets get two curves close to this one therefore.  To do this we can first square the function  this does not change the set of zeroes, but when we consider the function on all space it makes all values positive.  If we look at the points which have a small value therefore we will get two curves close to the figure of eight:

Now we need to get the small value to change with being negative in a small range, zero at two points, so the surface closes up and positive elsewhere.  If the value is positive then there are clearly no zeroes, as  is always positive itself.  We have already seen how to get this, using .  Adjusting numbers a little to improve the image gets the desired surface with two holes:

One technique that we used here was to square the function so that every point in space was given a number greater than or equal to zero.  This suggests a second method to make holes.  If we take a function that only gives positive values and add a second function, then the surface of zeroes for the sum must lie in the negative region of the second function.  In other words it cannot cross the zeroes for the second function.  Furthermore, as the new surface will touch the surface for the second function on a curve in the zeroes of the first.  Its easier to see a picture.  Take the sphere as defined above , square the function to get  and now add a second function, perhaps, giving .  This can be zero only if is positive, so we have:

The sphere now bows back in touching but not going through the plane .  We can do a lot with this trick to create holes.  For example, sticking with the sphere, let us use one of the functions from above to cut four holes in it:

given by cutting through the sphere.

As a quiz, what is the genus of this surface?

A final more complicated example uses the function , this defines a rounded off cube, that cuts through the sphere in an interesting way, to give an interesting surface:

Clockwise from upper left: round cube , round cube and sphere, sphere and , sphere cut away by round cube:

To finish the surface I began with, this is a Cayley surface, with four singularities (the places the surface comes to a point).  Up to some non-trivial transforms of surfaces this is the unique cubic surface with this property, a cubic surface is a surface where  no more than three of and are multiplied together, so and are possible but or $x^2y^2$ are not.  This surface is the same as the model I showed in my previous post.