Mathematics is vital!

October 13, 2010

[This is a painful post to write and probably to read, I attempt to soften the blow by including some geometric construction projects I have been working on!]

I write this as a UK mathematician recently moved to the US. A move decided upon before the election, let alone any mention of the deep cuts that the wonderful Science is Vital campaign is fighting. The brain drain for mathematics has been underway for a while. I was following the jobs listing in the UK closely for a couple of years and saw only a handful of permanent jobs.

 


Compound of five cubes made from laser cut and tabbed paper. No glue.

 

I am a firm believer in mathematics and mathematical thought. I believe that the ideas of mathematics are amongst the greatest cultural treasures and greatest achievements of mankind. On the other hand I believe that true mathematical thought is central to having a well-informed, engaged and active population. To me, therefore, the case for mathematics is clear both from an elitist and a populist stand point.

 

Students stand next to the Hexayurt they built, a project they initiated for the Mathematical Thought course I am currently teaching. The hexayurt is a simple structure that takes geometry into disaster relief housing.

 

Yet for a long time I felt that only the elitist case was being made, with some additions from utility in science. I have heard many people say the only answer from their teachers when asked “Why do we have to study mathematics?” was “You need to pass GCSE to get a job”. I wrote those feelings off, I could find many counter-examples and perhaps I was being over-critical. Unfortunately my denial could only go so far. I have already mentioned Science is Vital. Before that the same accusations could have been levelled at scientists. Yet when really pushed scientists from the great and the good through to the lowly lab workers rallied. 36,000 signed the petition, thousands marched wearing lab coats. If the cuts come no one can say that scientists went down gently.

What about mathematicians? We are smaller and quieter, have a harder time getting press coverage. Maybe an equivalent event would not have worked just for mathematics. Perhaps it is understandable that no protest had emerged from within mathematics as the first problems came. So what happened after the banner was raised by the scientists? Surely the pent up frustration led to overwhelming support?

Nope

The three big organisations of mathematics in the uk, the London Mathematical Society, Institute for Mathematics and its Applications and the Royal Statistical Society do not mention the cuts on their home pages, let alone Science is Vital. None is listed in Science is Vital’s long list of supporting organisations.

Marcus du Sautoy, a mathematician, currently Professor for Public Understanding of Science is not listed as a signatory, and does not seem to have said anything public

[Edit 14/10/10: Many apologies to Marcus, he did sign (though should be listed)  has written about the cuts making the case for mathematics in the New Statesman, and has given talks in Oxford and elsewhere. This is a great relief!]

similarly David Spiegelhalter, Ian Stewart, and Tim Gowers

[EDIT 14/10/10 corrections welcome, I am searching as I can online but that is not a perfect system]

all mathematicians with a public reputation and some access to the media all seem silent. It is very unfair to name names, I do so here as these are my heroes, people who do great things for mathematics and its popular perception. The fact that even they did not join the campaign reveals to me the depth of the issue.

In fact in following this event and even searching for mathematicians getting active the thing I could find was Michael Atiyah who was listed as first author on a letter calling on the government to cut military R&D rather than basic science.

EDIT [14/10/10]: Chris Budd also took part in a great debate in the Economist about the essential role of mathematics in innovation.

 

Four parallel sets of lines make up an octagonal weave, closely related to the Ammann-Beenker tiling.

 

Perhaps less notable mathematicians were more busy, signing and joining the protest, I would love to hear from those who did. For all other mathematicians I want to conclude by screaming:

Wake up, fight for your subject!

No longer accept the bad reputation our beloved subject has, change it!

Say how esoteric abstract nonsense has changed the world!

Say how mathematical thinking can help live a fulfilled, productive life!

Make the case!

If not you, who?


Building Mathematics: The Maker Faire in Pictures

March 16, 2010

[Update 18/3/10 The student from my Communicating Maths course who helped out with the stall over the weekend has put his story up on the course's blog: Maths Students Read the Newspaper .]

Last weekend I had a lot of (exhausting) fun at the Maker Faire in Newcastle. It was a wonderful event so many congratulations to the Centre for Life for laying it on. I was of course there attempting to corrupt people into mathematics, and we had almost more interest than we could handle. Many thanks to both the LMS and the University of Leicester Maths department for their support.

It was also a chance to build Sculpture 2 with Sculpture System No. 5. It will be heading soon to the lair of the JamJar collective somewhere in Leeds:

Enjoy the photos:

Preparing the sculpture...

Before the storm.

Mathematical Models

Daleks invade the 4th dimensions

Penrose tiles

The throng enjoying their chance to build mathematics

Our youngest visitor, fascinated by puzzles and tiling.

A world of zome, mostly built by our visitors.

The bane of our existence: The Tesla coil. Beautiful, but very noisy!

Looking into a zometool model

The first steps of the build

Fixing triangles together.

The finished object

...and again...


LMS internet communication 2

January 3, 2010

As promised here is a draft of my article on ideas for the LMS and using the internet for society communication. Please comment!

Currently the LMS has two main mean of communication. The first is the newsletter and the second the website. It has already been mentioned many times that the website is in need of a redesign. I will therefore concentrate on the options available for more general communication. In a way the modern version of the newsletter, however some of the ideas here might inform decisions on the redesigned website.

What options are available?

The first option is RSS/web feeds. Using these people can subscribe to the stories from the LMS and then let the system take over. The stories would then come in automatically mixed with their other news in the reader. If this is set up as a blog people will have the ability to comment back on stories and announcements. The futurelms blog has shown that their are people willing to engage in this manner, and have good comments to make.

The second option to consider is twitter. This is a new system and has been the subject of plenty of hype. The important thing to realise is that although much that travels over twitter is meaningless noise people can choose what they follow. It is thus reasonably easy to find the signal. It is thus a system that has attracted a large number of people who are worth following and talking to (whatever your definitions of those). I would single out in particular Lord Drayson (@lorddrayson) the Science minister who has used the system well, getting feedback and reacting to the concerns of scientists as well as simply broadcasting his messages. This engagement, as an example, generated a debate on science journalism between him and Ben Goldacre.

The final option are wikis. These obviously take their lead from the wikipedia. Essentially they provide a means for a community to jointly create web pages.

How can the LMS use these?

I want to start with a general comment. Whatever options the LMS decides to follow two things will be necessary for success (unfortunately they are not sufficient). The first is to commit to the system, with the suggestions below I will give some of idea of what this means. The second is to make the system as open as possible. If there are problems with spam inappropriate content etc, then these can be dealt with at the time, but trying to address all possible problem can easily create an unworkable system.

Another general comment is that all the communication should consider the entire community of mathematicians and maths related people in the UK. This will have a positive effect on membership as it will make the importance and role of the LMS clearer to everyone.

A blog for LMS news is the first, obvious option. In many ways this will take over from the newsletter (I will discuss that further below). This will enable news to come out in a more timely fashion (the newsletter can be a long way behind due to the constraints of printing and a monthly schedule). It will also allow comments in response to articles. As I mentioned above this would need commitment. There should be a dialogue, not just a broadcast. It would be important for the commentators on the blog to feel that their views are listened to, and regular responses to comments are therefore essential.

Taking the dialogue a step further would give the LMS an active twitter feed. Again this should not be considered a broadcast. This could be a way to get opinion and feedback from a variety of people both within and outside the LMS. Watching replies and responding would therefore be essential.

A final, and more radical step would be to open up the process of creating policy. This is where a wiki can come in. In draft form policy documents can be freely edited and discussed. Anyone with an interest in the topic can therefore express their view. This is something that might need to be restricted to members alone. Obviously the final document would be the work of council or the committee involved, however this would draw more people into the descision making process and allow the society to tap as much available expertise as possible, not just the (admittedly great) expertise of those who can commit themselves full time to council.

Going slightly beyond the idea of communication within the LMS the world is currently lacking good computer based news streams for mathematics. This is something that the LMS is perfectly positioned to provide. The stream could be a mix of simple links to important papers or events combined with the occasional specifically written article. Members of the LMS would form a natural pool to write these! It would of course help if they could be given some level of LMS blessing as a publication. The systems for dialogue (twitter and blogs) would give an excellent basis for this as people could put forward the stories that they felt were important.

How to implement this?

I have said above that commitment is an important part of these ideas. Unfortunately as it is the nature of things this does cost money. Some of the money is already spent. Their are people involved in writing the articles and gathering news for the newsletter for example. Some more money can be found by stopping the newsletter itself. The cost of printing and distribution can therefore be put into maintaining the online presence. This step will of course leave some people out of the loop as not everyone is using online newsfeeds. A half-way house option would be to produce the newsletter as an email (or pdf). This would be made up of the stories and events that had been posted during the last month. With a little investment in programming it could even be automated.


LMS internet communication

December 30, 2009

I have been asked to write a short proposal on internet communication for the council of the LMS (London Mathematical Society). More specifically, how the internet can be used to get better communication within the society. I am going to interpret this fairly widely to include communication between the LMS and the general maths community in the UK (given the nature of the internet it is probably more correct to say the world).

An obvious place to start would be with things like RSS feeds and possibly twitter. I plan to put my proposal up here in a few days for more specific comments. However if you have any preliminary comments please post below, or send me an email (edmund.harriss at mathematicians org uk). I am obviously interested to hear from mathematicians, but also from anyone with experience of setting up or using such institutional communication tools.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 203 other followers